Baltimore Restaurant Workers Awarded $34M after CO Leak

July 30, 2010

  • July 30, 2010 at 9:14 am
    okt0ber says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    They probably do have brain damage if it went on for weeks. It’s 23 people, that’s about a million each. I’d expect that if I was brain damaged by a hotel that removed the CO sensor, too!

  • July 30, 2010 at 2:21 am
    Sanchez says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Too bad there aren’t more details including what objective tests confirmed that 23 employees suffered “brain damage”. When people are pulled unconscious from homes because of CO2 there is rarely brain damage and they seem to recover w/o a problem. Masterful job by their attorneys.

  • July 30, 2010 at 3:11 am
    Village Idiot says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Duh, I hab the daim bramage, can I hav sum money?

  • July 30, 2010 at 3:13 am
    Caldudenomore says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Dude, intended or not, the use of “rarely” and “well done” made my day. Well played sir, well played indeed!

  • July 30, 2010 at 4:04 am
    Big D says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    That’s because Homeowner’s Insurance doesn’t have that kind of money to shell out. Deep Pockets, remember?

  • July 30, 2010 at 4:52 am
    T-Ma says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Here is information I found on proof of the brain damage:

    “The evidence of this damage was clearly visible from state-of-the-art high resolution MRIs, functional MRIs and CT scans, which showed irreversible damage to key areas of the brain which caused severe and persistent headaches; severe loss of short-term memory and the ability to focus, concentrate, and multitask; severe personality changes (depression, anxiety, symptoms of post-traumatic stress, disorder, inappropriate anger and the persistent urge to withdraw from friends, loved ones and strangers), all of which persist to this day.
    All of this evidence and testimony was supported by the vast weight of current medical literature on this subject.”

    He goes on to say that the plaintiffs are still working at Ruth’s Chris.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*