The tiger was not even on the road so how can they hold the owner responsible for people “rubber necking”. So if you are changing a tire on the side of the road and cause a distraction and someone wrecks, you are responsible. Unreal. The cop will probably get disability from the city and next year you will find him on a ladder in his new painting business. Give me a break. The original article stated that there were only minor injuries.
the only difference between the tiger and a deer or elk is that the tiger had an owner that they could sue. It’s not like the guy let him out, the tiger escaped.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
It’s GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREAT!!
The tiger was not even on the road so how can they hold the owner responsible for people “rubber necking”. So if you are changing a tire on the side of the road and cause a distraction and someone wrecks, you are responsible. Unreal. The cop will probably get disability from the city and next year you will find him on a ladder in his new painting business. Give me a break. The original article stated that there were only minor injuries.
Reagan…Nice remark. So where are you located genius?
the only difference between the tiger and a deer or elk is that the tiger had an owner that they could sue. It’s not like the guy let him out, the tiger escaped.
There were some major injuries to their wallets, apparently!