Vermont Jury Awards $3.6M to Victim in Priest Sex Abuse Case

December 19, 2008

  • December 19, 2008 at 2:06 am
    keepitreal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “HOLY MOSES “(excuse the pun)!
    The Burlington Diocese better consider a 2nd & 3rd collection at all Masses!
    Or better yet a Bishops Appeal…

    As for me – I’d let a priest grope me 2x for a few million.

  • December 19, 2008 at 2:31 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    wow, 1.8 mil per grope. I bet if you told all the altar boys today that if they let the priest grope them now and in 30 years, they could get 3.6mil, they all would line up.

  • December 19, 2008 at 2:40 am
    keepitreal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    No Doubt Compman.

  • December 19, 2008 at 3:00 am
    nobody important says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You are in so much trouble with Rosie, Compman. You will burn for this comment.

  • December 19, 2008 at 3:09 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ok NI, you just about made me spit coffee all over my keyboard!.

    I aint scared of that old hag! I bet these altar boys would rather be groped by the priest than Rosie. Now that would traumatize them forever.

  • December 19, 2008 at 3:13 am
    I sure hope Rosie checks in!! says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Now, these are the BEST comments I have seen in a while. We need to bow in the presence of greatness!!

  • December 22, 2008 at 2:38 am
    lastbat says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Any further proof that these lawsuits are only about the money need not be supplied. Just that fact that the priest is still alive but not the one being charged is enough to prove that these people are out to be made rich, not out to punish evil-doers. Where’s my priest so I can get millions?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*