Insurance Tax Increase among New York Governor’s Budget Proposals

December 16, 2008

  • December 16, 2008 at 2:29 am
    Bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Sigh…..gives new meaning to the term, “robbing us blind”….

  • December 16, 2008 at 2:31 am
    NY BrokenBallsBroker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Your article is a just a rehash of AP articles in every newspaper a day or 2 old. What Insurance Tax increase are you or they talking about? Does this refer to the Law Enforcement fee on auto policies? (currently $5/yr) You are an insurance publication so why not look into these things and get us some answers that make some sense. Also, the “obesity” tax on sugar sodas is ridiculous. So called diet sodas are much more unhealthy with their manmade chemicals and will (and have) cost people’s health and resultant health care costs in ways unknown to these politicos in Albany who know nothing about health and controlling health care costs!

  • December 16, 2008 at 2:36 am
    Obama bin Biden says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Howsabout a tax on fornication? Should reduce STD treatment costs.

  • December 16, 2008 at 2:43 am
    Bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    There was an article on this last week in this same publication and it DID include the numbers, percentages proposed…all of it. And no, it does not refer to the law enforcement fee.
    Now, if you are an expert in the field of chemicals placed in diet sodas, I’d like to hear the particulars of that, how the chemicals are more harmful, etc. Taking this a step further, my wife has diabetes and I’m very interested in learning how sugar-loaded sodas are going to be healthier for her.
    Bob

  • December 16, 2008 at 3:00 am
    Concerned says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    First I agree that this publication should stick to the insurance issues. I think the idea of tax on sugar sodas and not on artificially sweetened ones is going too far. Why not tax all soda, is it a necessity or a luxury?
    Why not just raise the sales tax or income based taxes?

  • December 16, 2008 at 4:58 am
    reaper says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It is just so interesting that all the big states that are having financial troubles – New York, California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey – are run by Democratic machines. People will never learn. Good-bye freedom! All the innocent tax-payers get stuck all the time and no protests.

  • December 17, 2008 at 11:32 am
    Mike says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yea, Diet soda can literally poison you..

    http://www.dorway.com/

    Just google aspartame.

  • December 17, 2008 at 11:33 am
    George says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Even a blind “squirrel” can fix a budget some times. But not this time.

  • December 17, 2008 at 4:19 am
    Jake says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The Tax is a premium tax that companies are requred to pay based on their annual written premium. Currently it is in the ballpark of 1%. Patterson is doing a good job of pushing business out of the state. He said a month ago that he was not going to approve any rate increases in the state over 3%, meanwhile he plans to milk the industry of more money??? You can get blood out of a stone!! This will create the withdraw of a portion of the available markets in NYS and then the residents of NY will have even less choices when choosing a carrier. I guess he doesn’t “see” it that way.

  • December 17, 2008 at 4:27 am
    Osama bin Biden says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Meanwhile, the welfare handouts to NY deadbeats are going up 30%. Huh.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*