so?! basically he admitted guilt by concluding a agreement (like and out-of-court settlement) during the trial. since he was a dr! sure did not need rebuff of the expert witness. the dr is an expert already, but in this case, did not discover the medical difficulty. i like the new rule, just to show good faith.
Very creative by Dr. Wenkert’s liability carrier (or more likely, her personal attorney) leaves the PA Guarenteee fund (or whomever) on the hook- gets her off the hook totally and leaves the collection up to the Plaintiff for 300 if she is absolved or 1 mil if pltf hits (which they did). Question: did Jury apportion liability as between defendents?
The way I remember it, PA was a 1% for J&S state, then it wasn’t, then it was again so which law was this tried under?
All is fair in love, war, and at trial. The settlement between each defendant and the plaintiff should always be confidential. If the psych had a good attorney, they would have done a high-low also. As an adjuster for very large cases, the Supreme Court rule to disclose all settlments is akin to meddling.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
so?! basically he admitted guilt by concluding a agreement (like and out-of-court settlement) during the trial. since he was a dr! sure did not need rebuff of the expert witness. the dr is an expert already, but in this case, did not discover the medical difficulty. i like the new rule, just to show good faith.
Very creative by Dr. Wenkert’s liability carrier (or more likely, her personal attorney) leaves the PA Guarenteee fund (or whomever) on the hook- gets her off the hook totally and leaves the collection up to the Plaintiff for 300 if she is absolved or 1 mil if pltf hits (which they did). Question: did Jury apportion liability as between defendents?
The way I remember it, PA was a 1% for J&S state, then it wasn’t, then it was again so which law was this tried under?
All is fair in love, war, and at trial. The settlement between each defendant and the plaintiff should always be confidential. If the psych had a good attorney, they would have done a high-low also. As an adjuster for very large cases, the Supreme Court rule to disclose all settlments is akin to meddling.