Willis Places Coverage for World Trade Center Construction

February 26, 2008

  • February 26, 2008 at 1:00 am
    Nobody says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Hopefully they have all the terms and conditions upfront.

  • February 26, 2008 at 1:47 am
    Hardy Harhar says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Considering that it was Willis who didn’t get the renewal fully bound and agreed by 9/11, and created the big problem in “one or two incidents”, it’s amazing they got the order for the wrap.

  • February 27, 2008 at 4:09 am
    you're an idiot says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Good thing you know the background of the negotiations of the policy placement before you rendered your opinion. Don’t you think Willis would have been dragged into the settlement if they were negligent in their attempts to broaden the cover to avoid stacking deductibles? It is so unlike our industry to not get the forms agreed to in a timely manner… I guess you saw the airplanes coming, cause you are so friggin smart.

  • February 27, 2008 at 4:36 am
    I. M. N. Idiot says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You are right, I am an idiot. And a good friend of mine worked on that particular placement. Other than busting his/your chops, I was really just commenting on how Willis landed the NEW deal after what had occurred on the OLD deal.

  • February 27, 2008 at 5:13 am
    OKY DOAK says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I rarely participate in blogs.. no time.. just would love to see a congratulations for once…but if you are busting a friend’s chops then I am all about that!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*