Fatal Crash Spurs Effort to Strengthen N.H. Teen Driver Laws

February 5, 2008

  • February 5, 2008 at 1:18 am
    DWT says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Sorry but I do not believe that requiring “addtional driver training” would prevent accdients like this.

    I live in a state that does require drivers training and unfortunately stupid people do stupid things behind the wheel, even after they have been given the required training.

  • February 5, 2008 at 1:50 am
    Saints Fan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree with you on that. How about these parents that go out and uy high-end cars like Mustang Saleens and 750ils for their kids as a gift for being a member of the lucky sperm club? It’s ridiculous what I have seen in the Fulton, Cobb and Forsyth County areas of Georgia as “gifts”. All privilege and no brains at all.

  • February 5, 2008 at 2:01 am
    JeremyP says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Just another couple of politicians taking advantage of a tragic situation just to get their name out in the public. Shameful.

  • February 5, 2008 at 2:02 am
    Ron says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Like most things these days, letting teens drive is a convenience to their spoiled, irresponsible parents who would raise hell with their politicians if this ever got traction. They don’t want to bothered having to drive their kids around until they’re 18 or 21. A better solution might be to restrict teen driving to ONLY when a licensed adult over 21 is in the vehicle and/or no driving after 10:00pm. That’s what it will take to put a dent in the problem but most people don’t have the discipline to make the sacrifice to do it.

  • February 5, 2008 at 2:21 am
    Mr. Obvious says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It doesn’t matter what car a teen has. My buddies and I used to try to get our cars airborne over some railroad tracks when we were kids. I drove a ’76 Gremlin and my buddy had a ’66 Rambler.

  • February 5, 2008 at 2:41 am
    KLS says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    My son is 2 years away from driving (someone shoot me now).

    We started talking to him about the dangers of being a dumbass behind the wheel. Whether or not it’s sinking in, I can’t say with certainty, but it’s better than saying nothing.

    We’ve discussed personal liability and accountability for one’s actions, and we’ve stressed the importance of being responsible with a machine that has the potential to kill someone. He nods his head and says he understands, but like most teens, he’s into showing off. So I’m willing to bet he will try showing off in a car at some point.

    Instead of stalking him 24/7, my husband and I decided we would make him buy his own car, learn to maintain it himself, and pay for his own insurance.

    We’ve helped him find odd jobs (lawn mowing, snow shoveling, etc) and we take him to the bank so he can put his money in his savings account. The little twerp has managed to earn a pretty decent (and scary) stash over the past year and a half.

    Our logic is that by doing this hard work and buying the car himself, maybe he will be less likely to do something totally out of line since he knows he’ll be paying for the cost of repairs and any damages he causes to others. Since he now knows how much it takes to earn money, I pray he just keeps that in mind when he’s behind the wheel. For the record, he knows we’re not paying for any tickets either.

    We’ve also set our own rule of no teen passengers and he is not to be a passenger with another teen driver either. We’re going to have to trust him on that one, but I’m thinking a few surprise “enforcement visits” will keep him honest.

    But the cold, hard fact is, unless we completely restrict him from driving, he’s still absolutely capable of being an idiot at any given moment and doing something as moronic as the kids in the article.

    That’s the nature of the teen brain.

    I don’t think legislation is going to change it.

  • February 5, 2008 at 3:04 am
    helloooooo...... says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    So why are you going to let him drive? He doesn’t have to, and since you sound like you don’t trust him and that won’t change in the next 2 years, make him wait. Why would you put a kid who you know is going to show off into a vehicle? Better to have a live grumpy kid then a dead one who got a license too soon.

  • February 5, 2008 at 3:08 am
    Gremlin & Rambler? says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Dang, are you ever dating yourself, Mr. Obvious. I knocked the drive shaft out of my friend’s Rambler ’cause the rear end slid back on the leaf springs. Remember those? Kids are going to do stupid things no matter what, but conditional permits/licenses may help.

  • February 5, 2008 at 6:43 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    first of all, the article never said if this airborne event was in the street itself…so where was this kid on the in-line skating?…where were the parents and why was he in the street? was this flyoff/airborne maneuver in a residential area? too many questions unanswered. yes, the kid driving the vehicle is at-fault, but i think that the kid on the in-line skate may have partial fault. afterall, does not the car have to travel fast? does that not mean you should have heard the vehicle? question: exactly where were you?

    questions that may never be asked, but yet, we think need stronger regulations or laws for teens. i believe since i do have 2 teens, at least used to be teen 23 and 17 yr old, they need minimum 40 hrs behind the wheel. in my state the kids have to go to traffic court prior to getting the license so they can see for themselves what it means to be there and the responsibility of driving. i like the earlier statement – driving is a priviledge and not a right. remember, that the parents of this child is also responsible for that kids actions, including the owner of the car (if not the parents). i like the idea of a curfew, because nighttime is more of an effort to keep your head on a swivel. some of here where i work truly think that we should not allow our kids to drive to school. what is so wrong with the BUS! this also, eliminates them from skipping out at lunch and not coming back or having an accident while out on school time. again, if we don’t make our kids responsible as a parent, how good are we ourselves? why just give them things when they whine?

    EARN IT!

  • February 5, 2008 at 6:47 am
    KLS says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Hi there “Helllooooo….”

    We’re going to let him drive because he’s been trying to earn the privelege. I do actually trust him, but it ain’t easy.

    Do you have kids? Teenagers? You love them dearly and you do trust them, but if you’re reasonable, you EXPECT them to make mistakes.

    I expect my son to screw up on occasion. I know I did at his age and I am still miles away from perfect.

    Show me a teenager who HASN’T been guilty of showing off in a car. I’d like to see that.

    You can coach, teach, and parent them until you’re blue in the face. But they WILL make mistakes. It’s human. It’s part of how they learn. You hope they only make minor mistakes. But a reasonable parent has to accept the fact that no child, no matter how well behaved, is perfect.

    This legislation is pointless. It isn’t going to prevent teenagers from having random fits of stupidity, as they are commonly known to do.

    Sorry if I left the mistaken impression that I don’t trust my son.

    My point was that it is very hard as a parent to give your kid more independence as they grow up, because you know they’re going to make mistakes. What you don’t know is – when will those mistakes happen. You can only hope it isn’t while they’re driving.

    Does that clarify for you?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*