Maryland Retailer Found Not Liable for Goose Attack on Customer

December 11, 2007

  • December 11, 2007 at 1:42 am
    arrgghh says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I guess the jury gave her the big goose egg! Sometimes there really is some common sense out there.

  • December 11, 2007 at 1:55 am
    Jarana says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    So, she didn’t know how the play the game – duck, duck, Goose!?

  • December 11, 2007 at 2:03 am
    Dread says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I think somebody should launch an investgiation into how the judge and jury rendered a correct, sensible,(albeit) simple verdict. This is the kind of case that should be made an example of by tagging the plaintiff and her loser attorney with defense costs for filing a frivolous suit. A Canada goose probably stands about 3′ tall and anybody with an ounce of sense gives them “wide berth” because they can be ornery, especially when a nest is nearby. There are thousands of them every year in MD. Plus, if that’s all it took to make this woman take a header she must be old, frail, over-weight, or some combination of all three. She probably needed a new hip anyway.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*