Civil Rights Group Opposes N.H. Public Space Insurance Requirement

July 27, 2007

  • July 27, 2007 at 1:58 am
    Will says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The leftists are the ones that are always rioting. Just make them pay for insurance. Why burden normal people with such a requirement?

  • July 27, 2007 at 2:02 am
    Patriot says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I see the ACLU is up to it’s old tricks of trying to run the United States and probably the world.
    Have you ever seen one of those pimple faced liberal attorneys that looked presentable.
    They all look like they just crawled out from under a park bench.

    The city is only protecting is ASSets. If they did not secure the required insurance and someone was injured the city fathers/mothers would be screamed at by, you guessed it, the ACLU for not demanding insurance for this event..Oh if I could be dictator for one year…….

  • July 27, 2007 at 2:14 am
    Will says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Patriot,

    You oughta love these stories:

    http://www.frcblog.com/2007/07/perkins_perspective_1.html

    http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/aclu-says-its-ok-for-taxpayers-money-to-fund-foot-baths-for-muslims/

    http://www.texasinsider.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=632

    http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/05/exclusive_so_lo.html

    I have no financial interest in these sites if that needs saying. Funny how the ACLU is only concerned with being as anti-Christ as possible, but they become very thoughtful when there’s any risk of being seen as anti-Muhammed. Hmmm…

  • July 27, 2007 at 3:20 am
    Gill Fin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    on the Don Imus case? When someones free speech is denied the ACLU is always there.
    Right? Right?

  • July 27, 2007 at 4:02 am
    Quaker in Philly says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    When is the last time the Leftist Quakers rioted?

  • July 27, 2007 at 4:38 am
    Will says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I guess Quakers are inoffensive enough, unless support for viscious monsters like Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, and Yassar Arafat offends weak constitutions.

    This is why St. Augustine condemned the Pelagians, of which the Quakers are prominent adherents: because of its potentially murderous consequences.

    Pelagius denied original sin, and Quakers deny the reality of the evil resident in the human heart, so that only bad examples lead to bad behavior. It’s the same heresy no matter how you slice it.

    In your case, you may not be a murderer, but the Quaker AFSC has condoned some of histories worst murderers.

  • July 30, 2007 at 8:44 am
    Will says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    That’s actually quite in character with some other winners:

    Jimmy Carter, anti-semite and tool of Muslim oligarchs who gave us the Iranian Revolution and the Sandistas.

    Yasser Arafat, terrorist.

    Nelson Mandela, Communist.

    Mikhail Gorbachev, Communist.

    Le Duc Tho, Communist.

    Jane Addams, Communist.

    So maybe there’s good reason why the AFSC would win this worthless propaganda vehicle.

  • July 30, 2007 at 10:04 am
    Cliff says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Where the ACLU’s coming from on this.

    The City of Richmond, VA has been requiring $1,000,000 for Special Events coverage for the last 15 years.

  • July 30, 2007 at 10:21 am
    Will says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “This year’s event will focus on… ending the prohibition against medical marijuana…”

    Isn’t that all you need to know? Anything that is harmful to America the ACLU is all for. Wanna smoke dope? Since it’s bad for you, the ACLU is all for it.

    From Thursday’s Daily Mail:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=471106&in_page_id=1770

    “A single joint of cannabis raises the risk of schizophrenia by more than 40 per cent, a disturbing study warns.”



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*