Ailing 9/11 Workers Sue WTC Insurance Fund for Sick Pay

July 18, 2007

  • July 20, 2007 at 6:46 am
    Widow says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Thank you for sharing your ego. Your teacher failed to help you understand that if A(city worker)performed rescue as part of debris removal (D), then all A is contained in D; if Ds(any D that became ill from exposure to numerous toxins during debris removal)is entitled to benefits (B), then Ds is contained in B. Therefore, transitive equivalent A is contained in B is true upon assertion of the truth of A. In other words, I am a valid member of the class and should receive the benefits Congress intended. I guess it is easy to assume the facts in order to have an opinion, even if you kich a few widows, widowers and orphans. No problem, you were not the first. You are correct in that the attorneys usually get the meat while the class members get crumbs. Perhaps you could become a champion of equity and do some good with your talents? This would creat more good than lazy thoughts or rock throwing. I feel that too many people complain about the conditions so they can avoid the guilt of inaction. Opinions are great, don’t get me wrong, but sometimes it is better to be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt.
    You need not respond, Observer, just look closer at the details when you observe so you can look past the obvious. There is a whole world of pain that you could do something about.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*