Appearances are often deceitful: Flesh and flesh needs were needed to appear \”as\” a man. And Jesus \”incarnated\” as one (John,1:1-3, 14). On January 27, 2006, 2:48 pm CST, my posting states clearly:\”Please note that I am not an atheist but a dissident baptised RC on his way to clear agnosticism\”. That been cleared, please note that I\’m not prepared to continue with this religious subject, paramount to \’hijacking\’ the message board. If you understand and live religion as you say (you haven\’t expressed which sect you mostly adhere to), good for you: you might eventually sit to His right side. I\’ll be there as well and we may continue with this. We will also be able to discuss whether the Bible contains more than one invented story as has been recently theorised re the complete Book of Exodus.
Exeunt Ozymandias, King of Kings.
Now, who has a hint about why the Travelers disowned coverage?
Dear all,
I\’m sorry about the turn this thread took (mind the alliteration) and since I\’m leaving right now on holidays for some 10 days, I\’ve changed my email address to be able to open any further comments from my destination and discuss if and when they\’re related to the original story. My problem lies in that I\’m going to the countryside 30 miles away to the nearest village with an internet service, so do not expect me to enter soon nor as frequently as I did these days. It was a pleasure to compare my ideas with yours and discuss openly on both. I apologise for the disgressions, including this one.
Cheers!
Two years after this thread began, I’m still wondering why was it that insurers disowned coverage. It is time to know that if, as it appears, they were properly sued for breach of contract. Anyone knows? Cheers and adieu for now.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Appearances are often deceitful: Flesh and flesh needs were needed to appear \”as\” a man. And Jesus \”incarnated\” as one (John,1:1-3, 14). On January 27, 2006, 2:48 pm CST, my posting states clearly:\”Please note that I am not an atheist but a dissident baptised RC on his way to clear agnosticism\”. That been cleared, please note that I\’m not prepared to continue with this religious subject, paramount to \’hijacking\’ the message board. If you understand and live religion as you say (you haven\’t expressed which sect you mostly adhere to), good for you: you might eventually sit to His right side. I\’ll be there as well and we may continue with this. We will also be able to discuss whether the Bible contains more than one invented story as has been recently theorised re the complete Book of Exodus.
Exeunt Ozymandias, King of Kings.
Now, who has a hint about why the Travelers disowned coverage?
When you come to a fork in the road – take it!
\”Nobody goes there anymore – it\’s too crowded.\”
Dear all,
I\’m sorry about the turn this thread took (mind the alliteration) and since I\’m leaving right now on holidays for some 10 days, I\’ve changed my email address to be able to open any further comments from my destination and discuss if and when they\’re related to the original story. My problem lies in that I\’m going to the countryside 30 miles away to the nearest village with an internet service, so do not expect me to enter soon nor as frequently as I did these days. It was a pleasure to compare my ideas with yours and discuss openly on both. I apologise for the disgressions, including this one.
Cheers!
Two years after this thread began, I’m still wondering why was it that insurers disowned coverage. It is time to know that if, as it appears, they were properly sued for breach of contract. Anyone knows? Cheers and adieu for now.