So how does an insurer, via their adjuster, get away with refusing to test for lead paint while investigating the damages from a covered cause of loss? Both lead paint and asbestos testing are mandatory in nearly every state, but the insurance industry ignores this to lower their loss payment. Maybe Spizer needs to look into this aspect as well?
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
So how does an insurer, via their adjuster, get away with refusing to test for lead paint while investigating the damages from a covered cause of loss? Both lead paint and asbestos testing are mandatory in nearly every state, but the insurance industry ignores this to lower their loss payment. Maybe Spizer needs to look into this aspect as well?