Great Decision. for Yankees, Red Sox and people who work hard and like to enjoy a good ballgame afterwards. This gold digging ignoramus got what she deserved…Nothing!
Do we have to tell Jane Costa that she could get injured crossing the street.
If I am not mistaken the back of the sporting event ticket says the ticket holder assumes all risk of the game of baseball…
I agree. I find it funny that the decision was based on someone of average intelligence. Sounds to me like she might have been a bit below average. Blonde, maybe?
This wouldn’t happen at Oakland as they have an usher by the name of Mary Lou who warns you about the possibility of getting hit by a foul ball or a whole or a partial bat. By the way if Fenway were as large as the Network Coliseum in Oakland the spectator wouldn’t have been hit. What was she doing at a ball game not knowing anything about the game. Smells “fishy” to me. Don’t forget the A’s lead the Western Division of the A.L.
I’m really glad that this woman was denied. Everyone knows that you assume risk by going to these games. Even the parents of that girl killed at the Columbus hockey game didn’t sue…
Maybe you wouldn’t find it so funny if it were your wife, daughter, sister, mother, get the picture. The article said she received permanent damage, I assume to her face. Some scam to go through the rest her life with permanent damage from a baseball. Maybe the spectators should be better protected from flying foul balls and broken bats. No one goes to a baseball game expecting to be injured by a baseball. Shame on your uncaring attitude towards another human being.
No one reasonably wants to see anyone get hurt at a baseball game. It’s not insensitivity towards the injured person; it’s simply that requirements to protect people from the very obvious in our society runs rampant, and we are collectively diminished when no risk whatsoever is tolerated.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
If we found out that someone filed suit like that, we would have beaten the sh!t outta him. Along with the Red Sox!
Leave it to a Yankee fan to act like an $%#hole.
Great Decision. for Yankees, Red Sox and people who work hard and like to enjoy a good ballgame afterwards. This gold digging ignoramus got what she deserved…Nothing!
EXACTLY!
Do we have to tell Jane Costa that she could get injured crossing the street.
If I am not mistaken the back of the sporting event ticket says the ticket holder assumes all risk of the game of baseball…
I agree. I find it funny that the decision was based on someone of average intelligence. Sounds to me like she might have been a bit below average. Blonde, maybe?
This wouldn’t happen at Oakland as they have an usher by the name of Mary Lou who warns you about the possibility of getting hit by a foul ball or a whole or a partial bat. By the way if Fenway were as large as the Network Coliseum in Oakland the spectator wouldn’t have been hit. What was she doing at a ball game not knowing anything about the game. Smells “fishy” to me. Don’t forget the A’s lead the Western Division of the A.L.
An Oakland A’s fan
I’m really glad that this woman was denied. Everyone knows that you assume risk by going to these games. Even the parents of that girl killed at the Columbus hockey game didn’t sue…
Maybe you wouldn’t find it so funny if it were your wife, daughter, sister, mother, get the picture. The article said she received permanent damage, I assume to her face. Some scam to go through the rest her life with permanent damage from a baseball. Maybe the spectators should be better protected from flying foul balls and broken bats. No one goes to a baseball game expecting to be injured by a baseball. Shame on your uncaring attitude towards another human being.
No one reasonably wants to see anyone get hurt at a baseball game. It’s not insensitivity towards the injured person; it’s simply that requirements to protect people from the very obvious in our society runs rampant, and we are collectively diminished when no risk whatsoever is tolerated.