Current Issue
Most Popular
- Should Insurers Be Concerned About Litigation Funding
- State by State Look at Driving Rules for Older Drivers
- New Suit Filed Over Alleged Golden Corral Illness
- Sons of Pennsylvania Drowning Victim Sue Property Owner
- 33 More Charged in Florida Staged Auto Accident Probe
- Drunk Arizona State University Student Left at Hospital With Note
- State Farm Releases Annual Top 10 States for Dog Bite Claims
- State by State Look at Driving Rules for Older Drivers
- Only 2 of 13 Small SUVs Do Well in Crash Tests
- Should Insurers Be Concerned About Litigation Funding
- New Trial Granted in Massachusetts Trampoline-Pool CaseMay 17, 2013 | Comments (2)
- State Farm Releases Annual Top 10 States for Dog Bite ClaimsMay 16, 2013 | Comments (2)
- Scientist Takes Close Look at Alaska LandslideMay 16, 2013 | Comments (1)
- South Carolina Store Owner Guilty of Insurance FraudMay 20, 2013 | Comments (1)
- Claims Costs Rise While Dog Bite Claims Fall in 2012May 16, 2013 | Comments (1)

Investigating Claims Involving Spontaneous Combustion
Use of Red Light Cameras Debated in Tennessee City
USFA: Changing Severity of House Fires Related to Building Configuration and Flammability Issues
Hundreds of Aftershocks Since 2011 Virginia Quake
University of Illinois Researchers Ease Switch to New Healthcare Codes
Only 2 of 13 Small SUVs Do Well in Crash Tests
UN: $2.5 Trillion in Disaster Losses Since 2000
Motorcycle Group Holds Power in Wisconsin Helmet Debate

That all depends on if you are a Repub or a Demo. Repub would say household member. Demo would say no it’s garbage and throw it in the trash can after its ripped from the womb. So a coverage determination is easy, check their voter registration.
AJALLEN: Your comment is totally irrelevant and in poor taste. Keep the back country right-wing gooberism out of a professional forum.
Publicus – there’s no need to attack all conservatives in an argument against a misplaced and misguided comment. Name calling does nothing to elevate your point.
“misplaced and misguided comment” ?? The above article was 100% about recovering a benefit (payment) from an insurance policy for INJURY. You can’t be injured unless you are alive, correct me if if wrong on that one. If you are alive as a fetus, when you are aborted you are killed (injured). 2+2=4 in my world. The answer to the “coverage” question above is simple for a person that is pro-life. It’s only the pro-death ones that have a conflict with it. And they are only conflicted because it concerns them getting a pay check.
But this fetus was not aborted, was it? Where does abortion even enter into it?
Publicus- That’s the problem with you left wing hypocrites/ democrats, you can’t handle the truth. The name calling always comes out when your logic fails. It’s either a life and resident or trash (to you anyway) and a non-resident. You can’t have it both ways.