National News
Breaking Story

5 Execs Found Guilty of Fraud in Gen Re-AIG Trial

A federal court jury in Hartford, Connecticut has found four former General Re Corp. executives and one former American International Group executive guilty of corporate fraud and conspiracy charges stemming from allegations that the five helped cook AIG's books in an effort to boost its stock price.

Advertisement

According to the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut, the four Gen Re executives convicted were former CEO Ronald E. Ferguson, former CFO Elizabeth A. Monrad, and former senior vice presidents Christopher P. Garand and Robert D. Graham. Also convicted was former AIG vice president of reinsurance Christian M. Milton.

The verdict comes after seven days of jury deliberation following the five-week trial. The five counts against each defendant include securities fraud, mail fraud and lying to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The defendants stood accused of taking part in a scheme of using reinsurance deals to inflate AIG's loss reserves by roughly $500 million between 2000 and 2001.

At the heart of the scheme was a complicated and fraudulent transaction in which Gen Re would appear to pay $10 million in premium to transfer $100 million of insurance risk to AIG - although no real risk had been transferred.

In exchange, as part of an unwritten agreement, AIG padded other transactions to refund the $10 million, as well as pay a $5 million fee to Gen Re for participating in the deal.

At trial, prosecutor Eric Glover compared the arrangement to one in which an insurer pays a driver to insure his car.

By doing so, however, AIG inflated its loss reserves by $500 million, allowing the company to convince stock analysts that loss reserves at AIG were more than adequate.

Back in 2006, AIG paid $1.6 billion as part of a regulatory settlement in which it agreed to restate nearly $4 billion in profits for the period between 2000 and 2004.

That settlement led to the 2005 ouster of long-time AIG CEO Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, who is an alleged, unindicted co-conspirator in the Gen Re fraud trial.

Stamford, Conn.-based Gen Re Corp. is a unit of Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway.

"The investing public must be able to trust and rely upon corporate management to provide accurate information in their public filings," said Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher. "As these convictions demonstrate, executives who violate the criminal laws by deceiving investors or aiding in that deception will be held accountable."

Added Kevin J. O'Connor, U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut: "We're very pleased with the jury's verdict, as it sends the appropriate message that those who engage in corporate wrongdoing will be held accountable."

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Ferguson and Garand BAM
Apr 12, 2008, 7:10 am
Ferguson and Garand John Peters
Apr 12, 2008, 7:00 am
RE: RE: RE: You All Miss the Point grixepipleree
Mar 23, 2008, 12:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: See what I mean Pud
Feb 26, 2008, 8:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: You All Miss the Point Pud
Feb 26, 2008, 8:55 pm
RE: Let's not forget the NCCI case dot_hemath
Feb 26, 2008, 8:40 pm
Let's not forget the NCCI case John Gault
Feb 26, 2008, 8:10 pm
RE: RE: See what I mean timaeus
Feb 26, 2008, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: Gen Re - AIG timaeus
Feb 26, 2008, 2:38 pm
RE: You All Miss the Point Jesse
Feb 26, 2008, 1:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Out of the Box Titanic watcher
Feb 26, 2008, 1:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Out of the Box Mrs Obvious
Feb 26, 2008, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: You All Miss the Point Norm Nunnally
Feb 26, 2008, 12:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: See what I mean Pud
Feb 26, 2008, 11:12 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Out of the Box former reinsurer
Feb 26, 2008, 10:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Out of the Box Nobody Important
Feb 26, 2008, 10:25 am
RE: RE: RE: Out of the Box GT
Feb 26, 2008, 8:29 am
RE: RE: Out of the Box Nobody Important
Feb 26, 2008, 8:05 am
RE: Out of the Box cupojoe
Feb 26, 2008, 7:47 am
Out of the Box Nobody Important
Feb 26, 2008, 7:42 am
RE: Gen Re - AIG BAMMBAMM
Feb 26, 2008, 6:54 am
RE: RE: See what I mean Jake
Feb 26, 2008, 6:44 am
RE: See what I mean BAMMBAMM
Feb 25, 2008, 8:24 pm
See what I mean Pud
Feb 25, 2008, 7:56 pm
comment on aig-re case the real truth
Feb 25, 2008, 7:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: If AIG defrauded public why are Gen Re execs BAMMBAMM
Feb 25, 2008, 6:34 pm
Gen Re - AIG Sebastian
Feb 25, 2008, 6:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: If AIG defrauded public why are Gen Re execs gui Mr Ethics
Feb 25, 2008, 6:22 pm
RE: RE: If AIG defrauded public why are Gen Re execs guilty? BAMMBAMM
Feb 25, 2008, 5:59 pm
RE: Comment on AIG-RE case Mike
Feb 25, 2008, 5:52 pm
Securities/Bid Rigging Convictions Show Compliance Need Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Feb 25, 2008, 5:37 pm
RE: You All Miss the Point No Problem?
Feb 25, 2008, 5:05 pm
The tragic truth underbroker4
Feb 25, 2008, 5:01 pm
Comment on AIG-RE case Manuel Acevedo
Feb 25, 2008, 4:44 pm
You All Miss the Point fed up
Feb 25, 2008, 4:25 pm
RE: CREATIVE ACCOUNTING HAPPENS EVERYDAY AT EVERY INSURANCE Ahem
Feb 25, 2008, 4:25 pm
CREATIVE ACCOUNTING HAPPENS EVERYDAY AT EVERY INSURANCE COMP X INSURER
Feb 25, 2008, 4:20 pm
amen, continued.... mark hester
Feb 25, 2008, 4:13 pm
Another D.A. running for governor? John Sterling
Feb 25, 2008, 4:12 pm
RE: Gen Re/AIG Fraud Trial Mrs Obvious
Feb 25, 2008, 4:08 pm
RE: RE: Amen Mrs Obvious
Feb 25, 2008, 4:05 pm
Gen Re/AIG Fraud Trial Been Around Too Long
Feb 25, 2008, 4:02 pm
RE: Amen mark hester
Feb 25, 2008, 3:59 pm
RE: If AIG defrauded public why are Gen Re execs guilty? Mr. Obvious
Feb 25, 2008, 3:54 pm
If AIG defrauded public why are Gen Re execs guilty? Dont Get It
Feb 25, 2008, 3:50 pm
Amen Tarheel
Feb 25, 2008, 3:46 pm
I owe my soul to the devil Bluemax
Feb 25, 2008, 3:42 pm