National News

Supreme Court to Hear Sprint Age Bias Case That Could Limit Claims

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Sprint Nextel Corp.'s appeal of an employment case that could make it harder for workers to prove discrimination allegations.

Advertisement

The case centers on whether allegations by workers who are not part of an original lawsuit and who were supervised by other managers than those cited in the original filing can be considered at trial.

In filings to the court, several large companies, including AT&T Inc., urged the justices to take the case. They hope the Supreme Court will overrule a lower federal appeals court, which last year said testimony from other employees can be heard.

If the ruling by the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stands, it expands employer liability for discrimination to include individuals who are not specifically cited in cases when filed, the companies say, and increase the frequency and cost of such lawsuits.

Besides AT&T, Honeywell International Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corp. filed friend-of-the-court briefs in this case.

The Sprint case began in 2003, when then-51-year-old Ellen Mendelsohn sued the company, alleging that she was included in a round of layoffs because of her age.

Mendelsohn sought to include testimony from five other Sprint employees at her trial. The employees would have testified that they had heard age-biased remarks and saw spreadsheets listing the ages of employees considered for layoffs, among other things, Mendelsohn's attorneys said in court filings.

Reston, Va.-based Sprint Nextel argued that the five employees were not supervised by the same manager as Mendelsohn and worked in different departments, making their testimony not pertinent to her allegations.

The district court agreed and did not allow the witnesses to testify, and a jury ruled in Sprint's favor. However, the appeals court reversed that decision.

The case, Sprint/United Management Co. v. Ellen Mendelsohn (06-1221), will be considered during the court's next term, which begins in October.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: Hopeful bill schneider
Jun 20, 2007, 5:43 pm
RE: RE: Hopeful steve
Jun 20, 2007, 11:42 am
RE: RE: How far is Al
Jun 20, 2007, 11:06 am
RE: How far is Hey Al
Jun 20, 2007, 10:22 am
RE: Hopeful sally sue
Jun 20, 2007, 8:51 am
How far is "freedom" supposed to reach? Al
Jun 20, 2007, 8:00 am
can't we fire anyone anymore? LL
Jun 19, 2007, 9:48 pm
RE: The Sam
Jun 19, 2007, 4:03 pm
The "Freedom" Argument KLS
Jun 19, 2007, 3:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: Two cents... Sam
Jun 19, 2007, 3:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: Two cents... Al
Jun 19, 2007, 3:19 pm
RE: RE: Two cents... Reality Check
Jun 19, 2007, 3:05 pm
RE: Two cents... Al
Jun 19, 2007, 2:33 pm
Two cents... Sam
Jun 19, 2007, 2:23 pm
Ridiculous Geezer Fellow
Jun 19, 2007, 1:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: AL Al
Jun 19, 2007, 1:44 pm
RE: RE: AL Geezer Groupie
Jun 19, 2007, 1:37 pm
RE: Scum Al
Jun 19, 2007, 1:06 pm
This is why Bush appointed Roberts and Alito Rosie
Jun 19, 2007, 12:42 pm
Hopeful Mary B.
Jun 19, 2007, 12:31 pm
Scum LM
Jun 19, 2007, 9:12 am