National News
Brief Filed for Sex Harassment Class Action Against Aon Subsidiary
May 5, 2003
A brief filed Friday supporting class certification in sexual harassment and discrimination lawsuit against an Aon subsidiary, Combined Insurance Co. of America, included excerpts from 128 declarations signed by former and current women employees who detailed the pervasive discriminatory and sexually charged atmosphere of a "male-dominated institution that allowed discrimination and harassment to run unchecked."
An Aon spokesman called the charges "self-serving and baseless."
Combined sells accident, health, life and disability insurance.
According to their attorneys from Chicago-based law firm Meites, Mulder, Burger & Mollica and Peoria-based law firm Benassi & Benassi, the women worked at a company that "barely pays lip service to its obligation of equal treatment under Title VII, but instead lets the company culture of discrimination flourish despite the real human cost to its female employees." The case, Traci Radmanovich, et al. vs. Combined Insurance Company of America, was filed on Dec. 13, 2001.
In attempting to establishing the need for certification of a class, the brief cites an opinion issued by U.S. District Court Judge James Zagel in a companion case filed by current Combined employee Brenda Palmer. In an opinion issued Feb. 24, 2003, denying Combined's move to strike class allegations, Zagel said the allegations suggest that "embedded within the very foundation upon which Combined rests is a chauvinistic and fundamentally misogynist view of women that is reflected in its company-wide practices and patterns."
The case involves Combined's "Seventh Essential Enhanced Sales Force," which sells health, disability and accident insurance door to door. Complaints include a lack of highly ranked women managers on the sales force, and constant harassment and attacks on women at every level of the company by workers and supervisors. One woman even alleged she was gang raped after a group sales meeting.
Aon spokesman Al Orendorff said "Combined is absolutely dedicated to maintaining a diverse, harassment-free workplace and will not tolerate conduct inconsistent with that policy."
He added that the allegations made in the brief "will be refuted in court where this dispute belongs and not in the press."
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| RE: RE: RE: Info |
cc |
Oct 25, 2005, 3:11 pm |
| RE: RE: mine got lost |
DH |
Aug 30, 2005, 7:12 am |
| RE: mine got lost |
van |
Aug 29, 2005, 3:48 pm |
| mine got lost |
DH |
Aug 29, 2005, 2:57 pm |
| everybody got theirs? |
DH |
Aug 22, 2005, 8:55 am |
| Points and Dollars |
ME |
Aug 18, 2005, 7:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: POINTS? |
DH |
Aug 17, 2005, 9:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: POINTS? |
van |
Aug 17, 2005, 9:20 am |
| RE: RE: Michigan Check |
Gail De |
Aug 17, 2005, 9:19 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: POINTS? |
DH |
Aug 17, 2005, 9:11 am |
| RE: RE: RE: POINTS? |
van |
Aug 17, 2005, 9:06 am |
| RE: RE: POINTS? |
DH |
Aug 17, 2005, 8:49 am |
| RE: POINTS? |
van |
Aug 17, 2005, 8:35 am |
| RE: Michigan Check |
van |
Aug 17, 2005, 8:32 am |
| POINTS? |
DH |
Aug 17, 2005, 8:31 am |
| Michigan Check |
Gail De |
Aug 17, 2005, 7:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
DH |
Aug 17, 2005, 6:55 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
mp |
Aug 16, 2005, 10:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
van |
Aug 16, 2005, 8:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
ME |
Aug 16, 2005, 6:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
CZ |
Aug 16, 2005, 5:36 pm |
| Just got mine today... |
TC |
Aug 16, 2005, 2:29 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
van |
Aug 16, 2005, 1:01 pm |
| RE: RE: Re: Check |
DH |
Aug 16, 2005, 12:34 pm |
| RE: Re: Check |
cz |
Aug 16, 2005, 12:31 pm |
| Re: Check |
Tammy |
Aug 16, 2005, 9:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Re: Check |
DH |
Aug 16, 2005, 9:39 am |
| RE: RE: Re: Check |
van |
Aug 16, 2005, 9:21 am |
| RE: Re: Check |
DH |
Aug 16, 2005, 7:42 am |
| Re: Check |
tabatha |
Aug 16, 2005, 6:53 am |
| RE: RE: List of claimants |
van |
Aug 16, 2005, 1:06 am |
| RE: List of claimants |
Amy |
Aug 15, 2005, 5:07 pm |
| List of claimants |
ME |
Aug 15, 2005, 5:04 pm |
| LISTING |
CZ |
Aug 10, 2005, 6:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: UPDATE still same |
Gail De |
Aug 10, 2005, 10:27 am |
| RE: RE: UPDATE still same |
DH |
Aug 10, 2005, 8:35 am |
| RE: UPDATE still same |
CZ |
Aug 9, 2005, 10:25 am |
| UPDATE still same |
DH |
Aug 9, 2005, 7:29 am |
| RE: checks |
TC |
Aug 2, 2005, 4:02 pm |
| checks |
van |
Aug 2, 2005, 2:42 pm |
| RE: RE: Notification, but no new post (?) |
Tammy Cyr |
Jul 19, 2005, 12:11 pm |
| RE: Notification, but no new post (?) |
van |
Jul 19, 2005, 11:57 am |
| Notification, but no new post (?) |
TC |
Jul 19, 2005, 11:37 am |
| It Is Appreciated... |
TC |
Jul 5, 2005, 12:38 pm |
| UPDATE |
DH |
Jul 5, 2005, 12:22 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Calculation |
van |
Jul 5, 2005, 3:55 am |
| RE: RE: Calculation |
as |
Jul 3, 2005, 8:46 am |
| RE: RE: Manweeks |
Jodi Hill |
Jun 29, 2005, 10:06 pm |
| RE: Calculation |
DH |
Jun 28, 2005, 2:39 pm |
| Calculation |
R Garrett |
Jun 28, 2005, 1:43 pm |
| bogus manweeks |
Michelle |
Jun 24, 2005, 1:53 am |
| Maybe There Is More Than Two...(?) |
TC |
Jun 17, 2005, 10:11 am |
| RE: This lawsuit is one of two |
van |
Jun 17, 2005, 2:02 am |
| This lawsuit is one of two |
Tammy C |
Jun 17, 2005, 12:11 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Request for further information abo |
Regina G |
Jun 16, 2005, 8:17 pm |
| RE: Check |
Tabatha McDermott |
Jun 16, 2005, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Request for further information about C |
Jodi Hill-7404080404 |
Jun 16, 2005, 11:50 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Request for further information about CICA |
Regina Garrett |
Jun 16, 2005, 11:20 am |
| RE: Request for further information about CICA |
Tammy C |
Jun 9, 2005, 4:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Request for further information about CICA |
Jodi Hill |
Jun 8, 2005, 9:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Request for further information about CICA |
van |
Jun 1, 2005, 3:11 pm |
| RE: Request for further information about CICA |
jodi hill |
Jun 1, 2005, 1:45 pm |
| Up-Date |
Gail De |
Jun 1, 2005, 12:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Info |
van |
May 30, 2005, 4:15 am |
| RE: RE: Info |
alecia |
May 29, 2005, 9:43 am |
| I think it is legit... |
Tammy C |
May 16, 2005, 2:11 pm |
| What is going on? |
T from Texas |
May 16, 2005, 2:04 am |
| wondering if |
VT |
May 14, 2005, 6:38 am |
| still no answers |
DH |
May 2, 2005, 2:39 pm |
| More info on letter |
ME |
Apr 19, 2005, 6:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Info |
Nichol |
Apr 14, 2005, 10:02 pm |
| Sexual discrimination based on sexual harassment |
Tab |
Apr 8, 2005, 1:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Info |
Gail De |
Mar 31, 2005, 8:47 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Info |
Tammy C |
Mar 30, 2005, 1:59 pm |
| RE: RE: Info |
DH |
Mar 30, 2005, 1:53 pm |
| RE: Info |
Tammy C |
Mar 30, 2005, 12:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Info |
DH |
Mar 30, 2005, 8:53 am |
| RE: RE: Info |
Gail De |
Mar 29, 2005, 2:20 pm |
| RE: Info |
Tammy C |
Mar 29, 2005, 1:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Info |
van |
Mar 29, 2005, 12:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Info |
DH |
Mar 29, 2005, 12:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Info |
van |
Mar 29, 2005, 10:04 am |
| RE: RE: Info |
DH |
Mar 29, 2005, 9:49 am |
| RE: Info |
van |
Mar 29, 2005, 9:42 am |
| Info |
DH |
Mar 29, 2005, 9:39 am |
| RE: RACISM |
van |
Mar 28, 2005, 2:14 pm |
| RACISM |
Gail De |
Mar 28, 2005, 1:59 pm |
| Question |
Sandi |
Mar 26, 2005, 12:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on s |
van |
Mar 19, 2005, 6:12 am |
| RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on s |
ANGEL |
Mar 18, 2005, 11:36 pm |
| RE: sexual discrimination based on s |
Tammy C |
Mar 7, 2005, 8:47 am |
| RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on s |
van |
Mar 6, 2005, 9:09 pm |
| RE: sexual discrimination based on s |
Tammy C |
Mar 6, 2005, 2:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on s |
van |
Mar 6, 2005, 2:29 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexua |
van |
Mar 1, 2005, 1:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual ha |
Tammy C |
Mar 1, 2005, 11:30 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harass |
van |
Mar 1, 2005, 2:05 am |
| RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harass |
Tammy C |
Feb 17, 2005, 1:52 pm |
| RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harass |
Tab |
Feb 17, 2005, 7:32 am |
| RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harass |
DH |
Feb 16, 2005, 8:24 am |
| RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harass |
Tab |
Jan 26, 2005, 1:28 pm |
| RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harassment |
Patricia |
Jan 26, 2005, 7:58 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harass |
VAN |
Dec 30, 2004, 1:25 am |
| RE: RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harassment |
Tab |
Dec 17, 2004, 10:24 am |
| RE: RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harassment |
debbi k lent |
Nov 12, 2004, 8:42 pm |
| RE: sexual discrimination based on sexual harassment |
shellie |
Sep 25, 2004, 4:48 pm |
| sexual discrimination based on sexual harassment |
Debbi K Lent |
Jul 16, 2004, 2:07 pm |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article