Midwest News

Missouri Judge Dismisses $7 Million in Fines Against Allstate

A Jackson County judge agreed on Wednesday, July 23 to throw out a contempt order against Allstate Insurance after determining the company had finally complied with his directions to release confidential documents.

Advertisement

The Kansas City Star reported on its Web site that the decision negates more than $7 million in fines that Allstate had accrued after Judge Michael Manners last year began levying penalties of $25,000 a day against the company in a bad-faith case.

The two sides agreed to settle the case on confidential terms last week, avoiding a Monday trial date. During a hearing Wednesday, Manners agreed that the company was no longer out of compliance with his order to release the confidential records and lifted the contempt order.

The case stems from an 8-year-old accident on Interstate 70 involving Allstate policyholder Paul Aldridge, of Hawaii, who struck a truck from behind, severely injuring the driver. Aldridge later sued Allstate for bad faith after it refused for years to pay a claim.

Attorneys for both Aldridge and the accident victim, Dale Deer, of Warrensburg, requested a set of records prepared by consultant McKinsey & Co. on behalf of the insurance company that showed how it set up a claims payment system in the 1990s aimed at generating big earnings while keeping claims payments low.

Allstate refused to turn over the records, saying they contained trade secrets and would reveal the company's trial strategy.

But the company, facing issues over the records in several states, agreed in April to post 150,000 pages of documents on the Internet related to how it handles customer claims.

Information from: The Kansas City Star, http://www.kcstar.com

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is j Mark1
Jul 29, 2008, 6:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is j Mark1
Jul 29, 2008, 6:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is j Good Hands
Jul 29, 2008, 12:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is j TwoCents
Jul 29, 2008, 8:59 am
RE: RE: Justice delayed is j Mark1
Jul 29, 2008, 8:35 am
RE: Justice delayed is j Good Hands
Jul 28, 2008, 4:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed TwoCents
Jul 28, 2008, 4:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is j Mark1
Jul 28, 2008, 4:05 pm
My Two Cents (sorry Two Cents) Good Hands
Jul 28, 2008, 12:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justi TwoCents
Jul 28, 2008, 8:42 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justi matt
Jul 28, 2008, 8:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice d Mark1
Jul 28, 2008, 8:34 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice denie TwoCents
Jul 28, 2008, 8:13 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice denied Mark1
Jul 27, 2008, 12:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice denied nobody important
Jul 27, 2008, 7:57 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice denied Mark1
Jul 26, 2008, 10:51 am
RE: RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice denied TwoCents
Jul 25, 2008, 4:24 pm
RE: RE: Justice delayed is justice denied John
Jul 25, 2008, 3:57 pm
RE: Justice delayed is justice denied Nobody Important
Jul 25, 2008, 3:02 pm
Justice delayed is justice denied media mogul
Jul 25, 2008, 2:18 pm