Midwest News

Ohio High Court Backs Ex-wife's Claim to Life Insurance Benefit

A 1990 law automatically terminating life insurance policies between married couples when they divorce doesn't apply to policies signed before the law passed, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled this week.

Advertisement

In a unanimous decision, the justices said it is unconstitutional to apply the law to policies that existed before it went into effect, allowing Carol Zerkle to keep the $32,532.30 she received from a policy when her ex-husband, Michael Holycross, died in 2003.

Barbra Holycross, who was married to Michael Holycross when he died, fought Zerkle's payout as a violation of the 1990 law, arguing that the former wife's rights to the money were extinguished when she divorced Holycross in 1993.

Zerkle's name had never specifically been removed from the policy, though, and the high court upheld lower court rulings that found applying the law retroactively would violate the state constitution.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: Misty, making personal comments about me isn't nece Mary
Jan 8, 2007, 2:43 pm
RE: Misty, making personal comments about me isn't necessar misty meanor
Jan 8, 2007, 2:38 pm
RE: Misty, making personal comments about me isn't necessar Linda
Jan 5, 2007, 3:52 pm
Misty, making personal comments about me isn't necessary. Second Wife
Jan 5, 2007, 3:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: Cases like this are so irritating. Mary
Jan 5, 2007, 3:31 pm
RE: RE: Cases like this are so irritating. Kat
Jan 5, 2007, 1:22 pm
RE: Cases like this are so irritating. misty meanor
Jan 5, 2007, 1:18 pm
RE: Cases like this are so irritating. not her fault
Jan 5, 2007, 1:03 pm
Cases like this are so irritating. A Second Wife
Jan 5, 2007, 12:53 pm