Midwest News
Breaking Story

Mich. House Passes Controversial Motorcycle Helmet Repeal Bill

With hundreds of motorcycle riders outside the Capitol, the Michigan state House today passed a controversial repeal of a mandate for riders to wear helmets.

Advertisement

The legislation passed by a 66-37 vote and is awaiting the signature of Gov. Jennifer Granholm.

Insurance Journal contacted the Governor's office and her spokesperson Liz Boyd said that "the Governor supports the current helmet law and does not support the repeal." Boyd would not comment further and did not say whether the Governor will, in fact, veto the bill.

Several previous efforts at overturning the law requiring all motorcyclists to wear a helmet have failed. The Michigan mandate has been in place for 37 years.

Essentially the bill would allow riders 21 and older to go without helmets if they have been licensed to operate a motorcycle for at least two years or have taken a safety course. An additional requirement would mandate that riders carry at least $10,000 in personal injury protection insurance.

Those supporting the legislation such as ABATE say motorcyclists should have the freedom to ride without a helmet. At least 30 other states, including some in the Midwest, give adults the option to not wear a helmet.

Organizations that oppose the legislation see the issue from a different perspective, saying not wearing helmets lead to more deaths and injuries, which will lead to higher medical bills and insurance rates.

"This is bad legislation--pure and simple, and no amount of political spin and rhethoric is going to make this a good legislation. You can't have good public policy by compromising on human safety." said Gary Mitchell, vice president of Public Affairs for the Michigan Association of Insurance Agents.

Each survivor of a severe head injury requires between $4.1 and $9 million in care over a lifetime, according to Mitchell.

Mitchell added that the number of accidents involving motorcycles has had a major impact on insurance and medical costs. Despite the fact that motorcyclists represent about 1.7 percent of the assessments paid into the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA), they accounted for almost 5 percent of all medical reimbursements, he said.

As of June 2005, the MCCA paid claims on 503 motorcycle accidents, totaling more than $210 million. The average motorcycle claim paid by the MCCA was over $418,000 last year (up 71 percent from the $297,000 paid in 1994).

AAA Michigan also released a statement opposing the repeal.

"We are disappointed and saddened that state lawmakers undertook this course of action," said Jack Peet, manager of Community Safety Services for AAA Michigan. "It makes absolutely no sense to make optional the only validated personal safety device available to a motorcycle rider."

The statement said that "AAA will continue to oppose legislation that leads to unnecessary deaths and injuries on our highways at a cost that would be mostly borne by the citizens of Michigan. A 2005 AAA survey shows that nearly 90 percent of AAA Michigan members oppose a repeal of the state's mandatory motorcycle helmet law."

According to the U.S. General Accounting Office, a surviving patient with a critical head injury incurs an average of $171,000 in medical and convalescence costs in just the first year following the injury.
The financial burden placed on both the state and taxpayers for this so-called "freedom of choice" issue falls on most Michigan No-Fault insurance carriers. Unlike automobile drivers, motorcyclists do not pay for No-Fault insurance.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's list of safety laws by state ranks only Nebraska and Michigan as "good" regarding its current helmet legislation. Eleven other Midwestern states including Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana and Iowa are all ranked 'poor."

In 1997, Arkansas and Texas repealed all-rider helmet laws, the next year motorcycle operator fatalities increased by 21 percent in Arkansas and 31 percent in Texas. Kentucky and Louisiana had similar experiences.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
Insurance company corruption Capt-Bly
Nov 22, 2006, 10:42 am
RE: Do Not Resucitate david
Oct 29, 2006, 10:56 am
RE: Insurance company corruption jim
Jul 18, 2006, 10:44 am
RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Archie
Jul 13, 2006, 8:36 pm
RE: Let those who ride decide! John Burgeson
Jul 9, 2006, 7:11 pm
Dean Whittier is another person penalizing the victims CAPT. BLY
Jul 1, 2006, 9:26 am
Agree with Thomas Kerr Dean Whittier
Jun 30, 2006, 10:02 pm
RE: RE: Democratic Riders for Devoss larry
Jun 26, 2006, 8:22 pm
RE: Democratic Riders for Devoss Bigguy
Jun 26, 2006, 9:03 am
Democratic Riders for Devoss David Rivard
Jun 25, 2006, 12:08 pm
Irresponsible actions -- criminal and civil sanctions? Capt. Bly
Jun 25, 2006, 1:22 am
RE: RE: RE: will it save money Ray Henke
Jun 20, 2006, 7:12 pm
RE: RE: will it save money larry
Jun 20, 2006, 6:01 pm
RE: will it save money Allan
Jun 20, 2006, 9:52 am
RE: RE: But will it save money? Tim Sullivan
Jun 19, 2006, 8:27 pm
Right On Capt Bly! Let the Inattentive Auto Drivers Pay! Ray Henke
Jun 19, 2006, 4:54 am
Let the inattentive Drivers pay! Capt. Bly
Jun 18, 2006, 11:28 pm
will it save money larry
Jun 17, 2006, 9:31 am
RE: But will it save money? Thomas Kerr
Jun 17, 2006, 8:01 am
RE: Insurance company corruption Wheels
Jun 14, 2006, 1:26 pm
No helmet, no coverage Brian
Jun 14, 2006, 7:33 am
Helmet Law Repeal is Essential for Motorcyclist Safety Ray Henke
Jun 14, 2006, 4:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry NoSpokes
Jun 13, 2006, 10:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry larry
Jun 13, 2006, 9:54 pm
RE: Where's the beef? Live Free or Die
Jun 13, 2006, 4:49 pm
RE: Live Free or Die wjk
Jun 13, 2006, 3:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Responsiblity Cheaper to let ... decide
Jun 13, 2006, 10:48 am
Where's the beef? Live Free or Die
Jun 13, 2006, 9:32 am
RE: RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry Allan
Jun 13, 2006, 8:52 am
RE: Evil Knievel and Indian Larry Noob Saibot
Jun 13, 2006, 7:27 am
Evil Knievel and Indian Larry NoSpokes
Jun 13, 2006, 12:55 am
Pittsburg QB Wannabe
Jun 12, 2006, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: Car Drivers Should Wear Them Too Tom Monticup
Jun 12, 2006, 10:46 am
RE: Ins. rates only inflate Still Alive
Jun 12, 2006, 10:24 am
RE: Ins. rates only inflate jayb
Jun 9, 2006, 6:25 pm
RE: RE: Fine ... as long as I don't pay for it Brett
Jun 9, 2006, 12:36 pm
Crap poo
Jun 8, 2006, 11:29 pm
RE: Fine ... as long as I don't pay for it
Jun 8, 2006, 9:13 pm
RE: helmet only good up to 15 mph. anyway S. Shank
Jun 8, 2006, 8:29 pm
Ins. rates only inflate Whiny witch
Jun 8, 2006, 7:06 pm
Helmet Gord
Jun 8, 2006, 5:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Responsiblity Live Free or Die
Jun 8, 2006, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: Responsiblity Growing Old for a Reason
Jun 8, 2006, 2:49 pm
RE: Responsiblity wjk
Jun 8, 2006, 2:25 pm
Responsiblity A Veteran
Jun 8, 2006, 1:36 pm
Pay to play insurance purchaser
Jun 8, 2006, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Live Free or Die
Jun 8, 2006, 1:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! No Helmet Wearer
Jun 8, 2006, 1:06 pm
RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Live Free or Die
Jun 8, 2006, 1:00 pm
RE: RE: Let those who ride decide! Mike J
Jun 8, 2006, 12:55 pm
Insurance companies... Eric
Jun 8, 2006, 12:51 pm
RE: Let those who ride decide! No Helmet Rider
Jun 8, 2006, 12:10 pm
Let those who ride decide! Dawn
Jun 8, 2006, 10:01 am
Safe drivers lower Insurance costs not after thoughts Lucky
Jun 8, 2006, 9:56 am
MC riders Pay Max
Jun 8, 2006, 9:43 am
RE: Car Drivers Should Wear Them Too Rich
Jun 8, 2006, 9:12 am
Car Drivers Should Wear Them Too Lane
Jun 8, 2006, 8:24 am
Insurance company corruption Rob
Jun 8, 2006, 12:08 am
But will it save money? Mike F
Jun 7, 2006, 11:05 pm
Do Not Resucitate Chris
Jun 7, 2006, 10:45 pm
Fine ... as long as I don't pay for it Brett
Jun 7, 2006, 10:38 pm
Jun 7, 2006, 10:35 pm